I’ve been released from my temp position and I’m unlikely to find another position this upcoming year since so many layoffs are happening in my area. Context: I have a single subject credential in English. I have 7 years teaching experience.
I’ve been released from my temp position and I’m unlikely to find another position this upcoming year since so many layoffs are happening in my area. Context: I have a single subject credential in English. I have 7 years teaching experience. I teach in California. I want to figure out what the best option is for next school year in hopes of continuing work that makes me marketable and still surviving on the income. Would it be better to sub or be an instructional aide? Any other options? I’ve been told that subbing is better since you’re supposed to be acting as the teacher, there are longterm positions, and if you are in a school that eventually needs a teacher you are more likely to be pushed into that position. Pay is decent but inconsistent; however, I have a ton of former colleagues that said they would put me as their primary sub, which is a win but also not an in since those schools are suffering mass layoffs. On the other hand, some have argued that being an IA allows you to build relationships with staff, students, and admin, which would allow people to see how you *really* work and make a name for myself in schools I otherwise don’t know. Pay is low but consistent, but it’s usually only part time positions (~4 hours a day). I’m looking for opinions on which would put me in the better position to continue my craft, build relationships, and put myself in the best hire-able position when there are more positions available. Or if you have any other suggestions, I’m all ears. Thanks! submitted by /u/Sad-Sleep-8484 [link] [comments]