I'm writing this because I keep seeing posts in this sub about state-level policy stuff that doesn't actually land until it's your classroom problem, and 109 is about to become exactly that. A few things from the actual text of the mea...


I'm writing this because I keep seeing posts in this sub about state-level policy stuff that doesn't actually land until it's your classroom problem, and 109 is about to become exactly that. A few things from the actual text of the measure that should matter to anyone working in a Colorado school: The bill gives the Commissioner of Education discretion over enforcement, but says nothing about how schools should comply. That means the implementation guidance is going to trickle down to district admins, who will hand it to athletic directors, who will hand it to coaches. Which means me. And you, if you're a coach or PE teacher or any educator who supervises athletics. The text doesn't define how sex is verified. I've been trying to imagine this in practice. Do I ask a kid for their birth certificate before they can suit up for a game? Do I look at them and decide? Does the kid's parent need to provide documentation? The bill doesn't say. The Daily Camera op-ed on this raised the same question — "who decides who gets questioned, who gets inspected, and which kids are going to be singled out?" — and the answer in the actual bill is: the schools figure it out. The unfunded mandate problem is real. There's no appropriation in the measure. Whatever compliance costs arise — staff training, document handling, parent communication, possible legal fees when a parent challenges an exclusion — that's on the district. Colorado school budgets are not exactly flush right now. The downstream effect on cis kids. I've coached enough volleyball to know that the tall girl with short hair and broad shoulders is a regular feature of any team. She's also the kid who, under vague enforcement language, is most likely to get a second look from someone trying to "verify" something. This bill doesn't protect her. It puts her at risk. The professional liability question. If a coach enforces the policy based on appearance and a parent sues, who covers that? If a coach doesn't enforce the policy and the district gets penalized, what happens to the coach? The measure doesn't address any of this. I'm not trying to make this about trans rights or sports philosophy. I'm trying to make it about the fact that this policy, as written, makes teachers and coaches the ones enforcing an undefined rule, on our own time, with no training, no budget, and no protection. If you're a Colorado educator, please read the actual text before November. It's on the Secretary of State's site. And please vote accordinglyhttps://www.dailycamera.com/2026/05/21/colorado-election-transgender-rights-measure-109-110-opinion/ submitted by /u/Right_Razzmatazz8420 [link] [comments]